Perfect 10.5" Shorts

10.5" Inseam Shorts

$24.97 Regular Price $48.00

Perfect 10.5" Shorts

10.5" Inseam Shorts

$24.97 Regular Price $48.00

We call these the perfect shorts for a reason.

With a 10.5" inseam and streamlined pockets, these are year-round bestsellers and sure to become one of your favorites.

Cool, casual, tailored specially for you – that's why they're the Perfect Shorts

  • Twill
  • Large smart phone pocket
  • Hidden Security Pocket with a concealed zipper and coin compartment
  • Zip fly
  • Welt pockets
  • Inseam: 10.5"
  • Classic
  • Classic fit
  • Our classic fit is what we built our brand on, with easy, straight lines
  • Hits at your waist
  • Style: 354120820
  • Learn more about our features

  • 100% Cotton
  • Machine Wash Cold
  • Do Not Bleach
  • Tumble Dry Medium
  • Warm Iron If Needed
  • Dry Cleaning Possible
  • Wash Inside Out With Like Colors
  • Remove Promptly

Reviews

Overall Rating

4.1
196 out of 249 (79%) reviewers recommend this product
1 to 4 of 917 Reviews
1 – 4 of 917 Reviews
3 out of 5 stars.

Nice Longer Shorts

2 months ago
I prefer longer length shorts and these sre just fine. They fit well and sre well constructed.
4 out of 5 stars.

A bit tight

6 months ago
Enjoy these shorts mainly for the phone pocket. I find the cut to be a bit tight in the thighs, and I am not overweight. Waist is different from one pair to the other also.

Originally posted on Perfect 10.5" Shorts:Bank Red

TX
Height5'6" - 6'0"
5 out of 5 stars.

Great Short with Dedicated Cell Phone Pocket

6 months ago
only shorts that I found to have a pocket sized for a mobile phone. Material used is great for casual wearing.
Height6'1" - 6'5"
Weight200-220
1 out of 5 stars.

Return policy made it not worth it

6 months ago
The shorts were probably fine, but the waist sizing was considerably smaller than the Ultimate Chinos, and Iron Free Khakis I had just purchased, 34. So after the return - between the shipping and tax - I ended up paying $15.69 to try on this pair of shorts. Won't be doing that again.